Search
Close this search box.

Fort Walton Beach Council discusses proposed short-term rental regulations

The draft ordinance combines elements from nearby communities' rules and has received initial support from rental platforms like Airbnb.

The Fort Walton Beach City Council reviewed a draft ordinance Tuesday night that would establish new regulations for short-term vacation rentals, with officials aiming to balance property rights with neighborhood compatibility concerns.

  • The proposed 20-page ordinance, presented at the March 25 meeting by City Attorney Jeff Burns, combines elements from both Walton County and Destin’s existing short-term rental regulations, which have withstood legal scrutiny since being passed in 2022 and 2019 respectively.

Burns stated that “by total sheer luck, Airbnb actually reached out to us and sent us something they approve of. And it actually happened to be very much in line with what we have here.” He explained that the ordinance’s format is recognized as standard around the state and has generally been acceptable to the short-term rental industry.

The ordinance would require short-term rental owners to register properties with the city annually, display a city-issued decal, and post signage showing contact information for the responsible party and the property’s maximum occupancy. Owners must designate a local responsible party who resides within 30 miles to respond to issues within one hour.

Maximum occupancy would be limited to the lesser of three options: one person per 150 square feet of heated space, two persons per bedroom plus four additional people, or a total of 24 persons per rental. The ordinance also sets minimum parking standards of one space per 2.5 occupants and requires fire safety measures including smoke detectors, fire extinguishers, and emergency lighting.

  • The draft explicitly prohibits commercial special events, such as weddings or company retreats, in residential zoning districts and bans charter bus services from transporting individuals to rental properties.

Councilman Bryce Jeter expressed support for the regulations while emphasizing enforcement concerns. “Anything we do up here comes back to enforcement. It goes back to code, it goes back to us regulating and reporting what we see,” Jeter said.

Some council members raised questions about specific provisions. Councilman David Schmidt expressed concerns about requiring signs at rental properties, suggesting it might create a negative environment for investors.

  • Councilman Payne Walker questioned the enforceability of occupancy limits. “It’s cat and mouse,” Walker said. “This all looks really good, but I don’t think we have the staff, I don’t think we have the police force.”

A resident who spoke during the public comment period noted his own experience with short-term rentals, mentioning he had received “over 60 calls for noise” at his property but “not a single citation,” suggesting current noise ordinances may be sufficient if properly enforced.

Councilman Nic Allegretto recommended getting additional feedback from short-term rental owners and neighbors before finalizing the ordinance.

“I want to make sure that we factor everything in to say, this is the best ordinance that we can craft as a municipality based on all of the rules that exist through the state,” Allegretto said.

The ordinance will undergo further refinement before its first reading at the April 8 council meeting. It will also be reviewed by the Local Planning Agency next week.

One Response

Join the conversation...

Continue reading 👇

Community Comments

“Why so many boot lockers here”
Respond
“This is bs. They just allowed the county”
Respond
“There have been no parking signs for years. No one follows them.”
Respond
“Mr.Siegel, you say we own the Air Force? Keep it up with the negative sentiment, and watch the Air Force close off each side of 98 with fences topped with...”
Respond
“When I was A Deputy with the Sheriff's Office I was issuing county ordinance citations to people who were parking on the right-of-way along the area of the sea wall...”
Respond
“I will continue to go there and enjoy my time on this earth. This is bs. They just allowed the county to gangrape the south side of 98, directly across...”
Respond
“The air force may "own" the land, but we the people own the air force. It's our beach to enjoy.”
Respond
“Like people actually obey signs, especially when they think they are entitled to access.”
Respond
“I have been here all my life! Born here raised here and never moved anywhere else! 52 years and we gave never had to do anything like this! Always had...”
Respond
“Actually I believe parking with walkovers could have solved the issue and granted us access to the wall( for those who grew up here). Too much congestion now at the...”
Respond

GET OUR FREE LOCAL NEWSLETTER

Get the weekday email that actually makes reading local news enjoyable again.